Could we have the feature to put Collections into folders (Sets and subsets) avoiding lengthy lists of Collections.
George Nilas commented
I don't understand how you can have them in Lightroom but not in Bridge.
Cindy Workman commented
I agree. PLEASE implement folders for collections. For people with large asset databases - managing them with collections that can't be nested into folders and sub-folders becomes truly unwieldy. The program's sole purpose is to manage assets and yet this feature is missing?
denise howard commented
Or to be able to nest collections
If the collection set is implement in Bridge it would be a great improvement!
it already exists in Lightroom
Chris Bassett commented
Yes I agree. It would be helpful if people could create folders in Bridge in which to place Collections (sort of how Collection sets work in Lightroom). This is probably the single-most annoying missing feature in Bridge that would make it so much better, and I don't think it would be terribly hard to implement (I mean, they could just read the physical file/folder structure from the disc and build the Collections tree from that).
I strongly agree with Peter. Collections are very powerful - particularly smart collections, but by allowing them to be put into sets it means that it will be much easier to organise your assets.