Collection Sets
Could we have the feature to put Collections into folders (Sets and subsets) avoiding lengthy lists of Collections.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/45bddaf39187969368733f588fcb1261?size=40&default=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.uvcdn.com%2Fpkg%2Fadmin%2Ficons%2Fuser_70-6bcf9e08938533adb9bac95c3e487cb2a6d4a32f890ca6fdc82e3072e0ea0368.png)
-
Carlo Dacumos commented
waiting for the implementation of folders in collections. it's a big help for our large databases of publications. also add export collections, just like in lightroom. We're spending a lot for these apps. HOPE THAT YOU ADD MORE FEATURES ESPECIALLY IN THE COLLECTIONS PANEL.
-
Nikolai Sklobovsky commented
YES! have been asking for that for years
-
George Nilas commented
I don't understand how you can have them in Lightroom but not in Bridge.
-
Cindy Workman commented
I agree. PLEASE implement folders for collections. For people with large asset databases - managing them with collections that can't be nested into folders and sub-folders becomes truly unwieldy. The program's sole purpose is to manage assets and yet this feature is missing?
-
denise howard commented
Or to be able to nest collections
-
Anonymous commented
If the collection set is implement in Bridge it would be a great improvement!
---
it already exists in Lightroom -
Chris Bassett commented
Yes I agree. It would be helpful if people could create folders in Bridge in which to place Collections (sort of how Collection sets work in Lightroom). This is probably the single-most annoying missing feature in Bridge that would make it so much better, and I don't think it would be terribly hard to implement (I mean, they could just read the physical file/folder structure from the disc and build the Collections tree from that).
-
Richard commented
I strongly agree with Peter. Collections are very powerful - particularly smart collections, but by allowing them to be put into sets it means that it will be much easier to organise your assets.