Associated Feedback thread:

https://adobebridge.uservoice.com/forums/905377-report-bugs/suggestions/40745434--jpeg-extension-instead-of-jpg-windows-10

Our online photo management system reads JPEG files and corrupts them for some reason. Their tech support advised us to upload JPG instead of JPEG. For some reason Adobe Bridge developers have yet to give us an answer why they force all exports with JPEG extension. Please fix this. Our photo studio is jumping through hoops because of this.

completely agree also for the possibility to choose, maybe directly in "export" and also in the raw camera processor, or in preferences

This is real problem. Not even Mac publishers want this.

Looking forward to the fix!!!!!!!!!!

I cannot use bridge if the file extension is different to that used by lightroom on export. I need to end up with one single set of exported files regardless of the software used to create them. Bridge has now become a singular problem in my workflow.

Photoshop throws a warning that the the .JPEG extension is non-standard (for Photoshop).

More here:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/photoshop-ecosystem-discussions/jpg-jpeg/m-p/12760785

https://community.adobe.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/367888i348EB2C82B15F153/image-size/original?v=1.0&px=-1

https://community.adobe.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/367892i9868AA923ABD277B/image-size/original?v=1.0&px=-1

both extension nomination must be accessible and include in all export

It's indefensible not offering the choice and in addition it's an inconsistent, lazy implementation not to take this into consideration considering that both are widely used and that adobe has always defaulted to .jpg in the past.

People have systems and processes and these details do matter. Batch rename makes it worse, as it creates a duplicate if file allready exists which makes more and more mess.

Slow. Hand. Clap. for Adobe.

This needs fixing.

batch rename doesn't work I guess as I need it to overwrite for my workflow.

this is an impressive oversight from adobe. Export is entirely useless to me because of this.

To fix it's just one character.

Its not a solution, but a workaround;
After the files have been saved as a jpeg
create a Batch rename with NEW EXTENSION as NEW FILE NAME.
And DONT forget to only selected jpegs....;-)

Is this being addressed? Or is Adobe trying to change the extension to jpeg to purposely conflict with other software? Not being facetious, actually wondering because this is often a marketing strategy.

Every other Adobe application saves files as "jpg"

Why on earth would Bridge start exporting as "jpeg"

It makes NO sense, and especially if you want an exported file to overwrite a file made in another application, such as Photoshop.

Baffling.

I agree, also for the ".tiff" and ".tif" and where is the option for LZW? ZIP only?

I also have problems with the file extension "jpeg" because my CMS requires the extension "jpg". It would be great if this could be adapted.