Simone Onorati
My feedback
19 results found
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment At least the R/G/B/L histogram, would be a very nice addition to Bridge. It could be of help during the photos selection, showing the amount of clipped tones or the overall exposition of the shot.
-
2 votes
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment The issue is still present in Bridge 2023 (v 13.0.1)
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Issue resolved in Bridge v 13.0.1. 👍
What still remains unsolved is at my other post:
https://adobebridge.uservoice.com/forums/905377-report-bugs/suggestions/41439721-editing-capture-date-strange-behavioursAn error occurred while saving the comment This also happens to me, but only since the last update of Bridge in April/May 2021 (v 11.0.2.123). When clicking the EXIF Capture date/time to edit it, the Edit date/time dialog appears, and the date/time field cannot be modified in any way. One has either to use the calendar or, to change the time, use the "Add/subtract" option. Annoying!
Please fix, and also please take a look at my other reports
https://adobebridge.uservoice.com/forums/905377-report-bugs/suggestions/41439721-editing-capture-date-strange-behaviours -
11 votes
This issue is fixed in Bridge 12.0.1, now batch rename files in pairs RAW + JPG
-
8 votes
-
4 votes
-
8 votes
-
21 votes
-
1 vote
-
4 votes
Thank you for sharing this feedback. We will review this enhancement for future releases.
-
6 votes
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I totally agree, and this addition should be of zero effort for the developers.
Also for every average laptop with 13"-14" full HD (1920x1080) screen, 100% of zoom for the GUI elements is too little, and 200% is too much! I'm quite annoyed. Please fix...
-
2 votes
-
6 votes
-
2 votes
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Yes, I totally agree, this would make Bridge a very complete DAM software.
At least, give the possibility to show the location(s) of photos selected in folders/collections in a map, for photos already tagged (for example with the GeoSetter software).
This behaviour is still present in Bridge 2023.
I find it quite annoying because the user is not allowed to choose which version of the shot (RAW/JPG) to move/copy, and he is not warned about the choice made by Bridge of moving both in any case.
It is still possible to separate RAWs from JPEGs if we move not the RAW version away but the JPEG, in this case the RAWs are left in the original folder.
The best equipment woud be the ability for the user to group RAWs and JPEGs, and to choose upon copying/cutting or pasting operation, whether to copy/move/paste only JPGs, RAWs, or both.